A Level Politics

Improving your grade

Four (million) weddings and a tax allowance

Posted by Matt Walker on April 11, 2010

The Conservative Party have continued to set the agenda during the early stages of this election campaign. This time it has been through their proposals on tax allowances for married couples. Their plan is to allow one married partner to transfer their unused tax allowance to their other half. It would be worth £150 a year to around 4 million married couples.

The Conservative justification for this policy is that the British tax system is unfair, penalising married couples by treating them as individuals rather than as couples. The Conservatives have said that they want to support commitment, rather than moralise about people’s life choices. This of course is a fine dividing line. Promotion of marriage and families is a strong theme which runs through conservatism. Conservatives argue that the two-parent family is an important source of nurturing and authority, and is therefore the basis of a strong and stable society.

Interestingly, Gordon Brown’s criticism of this policy was not that it rewarded marriage through the tax system, but that it was disingenuous given the Tories’ other policies which would take money away from families. Brown himself stated that marriage is the basis of society.This is not surprising given the prime minister’s Presbyterian and New Labour roots, a reminder that whilst political parties may tend to centre their values around a single ideology, they will also be influenced by opposing ideologies.

Arguably, Yvette Cooper offered a better critique of the proposal when she said that if a man left his wife to set up home with another woman, upon remarriage he could gain the tax benefit, whereas his wronged ex-wife would not. (Presumably, the gender of the wrongdoer could be reversed!)

It was left to the Liberal Democrats to offer an ideological criticism of the Conservative proposals. Nick Clegg, specifically referring to his own liberal values, stated that the policy was wrong, and that the government should not moralise about people’s life choices nor financially favour one group of people over another simply because of how they organise their private lives.

It is clear that ideological differences have and will continue to surface during this campaign, even though the parties will try to down play them. And as always, disagreements regarding the role of the state are at the centre of it all.

BBC article

BBC News report


4 Responses to “Four (million) weddings and a tax allowance”

  1. Dan T said

    I noticed this morning that the ideological differences are there if you look hard enough 🙂

    Ed Milliband was saying the even though both Lab and Con want to maximise the development of the individual and basically enlarge individuals positive freedoms. The Labour Party, and common sense (he said), are both of the opinion that the state is fundamental in improving the well being of the people in the country.
    He went on to say that the fundamental difference is that the conservatives believe that a big society will better solve problems and ensure prosperity both socially and economically – but that this judgement was wrong because the state is the only FAIR way of facilitating personal and economic growth. And that the conservatives “do nothing” (classical liberal/neo-liberal) approach would be a big mistake.

    Brilliant stuff.

  2. Sam Dalton said

    What about couples who are not married but have the same “committment”? As Yvette Cooper said, what about the woman whose husband has left her?
    It is a riduculous policy that is completely out of date.

    The policy will still not achieve its aim though. How is $3 per week going to persuade a couple to go through all the expsenses of getting married? Two packets of hobnobs a week is hardly much of a reward is it? It’s a half-hearted policy, saying “we’ll give you a reward, but only a tiny little one that won’t actually benefit you to any great effect.”

  3. Hi Dan. How goes it? I’ll take a look at your essay very soon. Hope you’re enjoying the holiday!

    • Dan T said

      It goes good. The election is proving time consuming but interesting.
      Loving the sunshine, when it appears 🙂
      Revision for this years gopo exams is also better than last year as its so much more structured because of that specification thing you gave us, thanks. 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: